It will depend on how many feet are in 162 inches.
<h3>Inch-to-feet conversion</h3>
According to metrics, 12 inches = 1 foot
Hence, 162 inches will be: 162/12 = 13.5 ft
However, the maximum height that the bridge can accommodate according to the illustration is 12 ft 5 inches.
13.5 ft is significantly more than 12 ft 5 inches.
Thus, it is highly unlikely that the truck can pass safely under the bridge.
More on metric conversion can be found here: brainly.com/question/10943201
#SPJ1
Answer:
Twenty-Fifth
Explanation:
Twenty-fifth amendment, is an amendment made in the constitution of the U.S. laying down the succession rules regarding vacancies and disabilities of the president's office and vice president's office. This clarifies that if the president dies, resigns or is removed from office, the vice president becomes president (as opposed to the acting president); and specifies procedures for filling a vacancy in the vice president's office and responding to it.
Answer:
A system of government in which powers are shared between two levels of government is known as a Federal system.
Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
The main reason, in my opinion, that Martineau’s work in sociological areas of marriage, children, and domestic life were ignored is that, during that time, there was not a want or a need for change. Women were seen as not to be above their stations and there was absolutely no need for them to think, much less even ACT upon the ideas that Martineau put forth. While it’s true that Queen Victoria herself was a fan, most of the ideas put forth by women at this time were strictly ideas and were never, ever thought to be put in practice, but to just help them “get through it.” It is only recently that her ideas have been recognized by sociologists all around the world as scholarly. Remember—during the time, women were not meant to be scholarly past playing the piano forte.
Hope this gives you a springboard to jump off of.
