Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
Answer: 
Step-by-step explanation:
Observe the given figure.
You can identify that the measure of the angle "B" is:
Knowing this, you can conclude that the angle "p" and the angle "m" are Complementary angles, which means that the sum of their measures is 90 degrees. Then, you can write the following equation:
[Equation 1]
You know that:
Then you can substitute it into the [Equation 1] and then solve for 
. Therefore, you get:
7. 324m squared
8. 166mm squared
9. 49.2yd squared
sorry I'm too lazy to do the rest
