Jackson and Tocqueville shared values related to populism and individualism.
<h3>What values were adopted only by Tocqueville?</h3>
- Egalitarianism.
- Freedom.
- Laissez-faire.
As can be seen above, Tocqueville was an advocate of egalitarianism and liberty. This means that he believed that in a society everyone should have the right to freedom and should be seen as equal and worthy of the same right. In this case, we can consider that he would not support slavery in American countries, as he violated the two values he defended all his life.
Tocqueville would believe that slavery was a cruel system that devalued people and caused damage to freedom and social well-being.
Learn more about Tocqueville:
brainly.com/question/24465858
#SPJ1
Answer:
Europeans became more aware of other cultures. They encountered new ideas and knowledge, as well as new foods, spices, cloth, and other exotic goods. Travellers returned to their homes with new ideas and attitudes that led to new ways of thinking about their own lives and their own societies.
Explanation:
I believe an Initiative is C. A vote on a legislative measure.
Answer:
C is correct
Explanation:
Athens was a democracy where all male citizens had equal political rights.
Answer:
I think that the founding fathers chose this set of liberties because citizens demanded a guarantee of their basic freedoms. The five freedoms it protects: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. Together, these five guaranteed freedoms make the people of the United States of America the freest in the world. There’s no “legal age” you have to reach to exercise your First Amendment freedoms. They are guaranteed to you the day you’re born. There’s also no citizenship requirement for First Amendment protection. If you’re in the U.S., you have freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition. Without the First Amendment, religious minorities could be persecuted, the government might well establish a national religion, protesters could be silenced, the press could not criticize government, and citizens could not mobilize for social change.
Explanation: