Answer:
The average rate of change of <em>g</em> from <em>x</em> = <em>a</em> to<em> x</em> = <em>a</em> + <em>h</em> is -3.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the function:
And we want to determine its average rate of change of the function for <em>x</em> = <em>a</em> and <em>x</em> = <em>a</em> + <em>h</em>.
To determine the average rate of change, we find the slope of the function between the two points. In other words:
Simplify:
In conclusion, the average rate of change of <em>g</em> from <em>x</em> = <em>a</em> to <em>x</em> = <em>a</em> + <em>h</em> is -3.
This is the expected result, as function <em>g</em> is linear, so its rate of change would be constant.
She can make 2 necklaces with 4 inches remaining of string.
<span>(y + 9)(y - 2) = 0 would be the correct answer .</span>
Answer:
Kate's possible hourly rate of pay: $34.75
Hours of overtime: 100
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find Kate's hourly wage, we can set up an equation based on the number of hours she works per week and the estimated number of overtime hours to equal her total pay for the year. If Kate works 36 hours/week and there are 52 weeks in a year, her total hours for one year are: 36 x 52 = 1872. Setting up an equation based on her total earnings of $72,000:
1872x + 100(2x) = 72000, where 'x' is the hourly rate and '2x' is her overtime rate which is double time.
Combine like terms: 1872x + 200x = 72000 or 2072x = 72000
Divide both sides by 2072: 2072x/2072 = 72000/2072
Solve for x: x = $34.75
Kate's hourly rate is estimated at $34.75. We can check to see if this is correct by putting this value back into our original equation:
1872(34.75) + 100(2)(34.75) = 65052 + 6950 = 72002
The answer of $72,002 is very close to $72,000 and the best estimate of Kate's hourly wage and overtime hours.
Answer:
1 in 12
Step-by-step explanation:
hard to explain
