Answer:
(0.88, 0,65)
Step-by-step explanation:
what do we have to do ? I assume we need to find the crossing point between the 2 lines.
when looking at the graphic, we can already rule out the first, third and fourth option.
none of the coordinates of that point is larger than 1 in any direction or smaller than 0.5.
so, just by looking at things I immediately "bet" on answer option 2 (0.88, 0.65).
but let's check.
y = -2x/5 + 1
y = 3x - 2
for the crossing point both functions must produce the same functional value.
=>
-2x/5 + 1 = 3x - 2
-2x/5 + 5/5 = 15x/5 - 10/5
-2x + 5 = 15x - 10
15 = 17x
x = 15/17 = 0.88...
y = 3×0.88... -2 = 0.65...
hurray, our original observation and "suspicion" is confirmed.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Put the equation in the form ax+by+c=0:

Check the solutions:
:

So this is not a solution.
(
:

So this is a solution
It is C) 2.55 because i was taught that you can subtract the negative from the positive. 5.35-2.8=2.55 and it is positive
Answer:
80 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum of the interior angles of a triangle = 180
a + 50 + 50 = 180
a = 80
<h3>
Answer: Choice C</h3>
Explanation:
As the person spends more time raking, the number of leaves will go down. Therefore, we have a negative correlation. Such correlations occur when one variable goes up while the other goes down (and vice versa).
The reason why it's considered negative correlation is because the regression line has a negative slope.
This is why choice C is the answer. This assumes that no extra leaves fall on the ground, and we assume that we don't have nearby leaves blow into the yard.
In contrast, something like choice A has both variables go up together. As the temperature rises, so does the ice cream sales. The same goes for choice B. We consider these cases to have positive correlation. Choice D doesn't appear to have any correlation at all. The person's height doesn't have any connection to the number of pets they may have.