Answer:
a) Chimel vs. California
Explanation:
The Chimel vs California case was a result of police officers going to Chimel's home with a warrant that authorized his arrest for burglary. After the warrant was served, the police officers comprehensively searched the house of Chimel. The search revealed various items that were used as exhibit to convict Chimel. The State Courts upheld Chimel's conviction. However the Supreme Court in a 6-2 decision, did not find the search of the full house reasonable, as a search warrant would be needed for this cause.
Answer:
Quid pro quo harassment
Explanation:
Quid pro quo harassment is a type of harassment in the workplace that requires the harassed person(employee or potential employee) to offer something(sex) to get an appointment(in the case where the person is yet to be employed) or get promoted to a higher role( in the case where a person is employed already in the organization) in the organization.
Freed slaves, and abolished slavery The thirteenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolished slavery and all other forms of involuntary servitude, excluding involuntary lab…or as punishment for a crime.
Hello There!
<span>Questions regarding the subject's background and casual conversation are called non threatening questions.
</span>
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
- Hannah ❤
Magnification is the action or process of magnifying something or being magnified especially visually.
