1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_tiger [21]
3 years ago
10

According to a recent report, customers who shop at a certain online store spend, on average, s1,500 a year at the store. To inv

estigate whether the mean amount spent was greater than the reported averag obtained the mean and standard deviation of the amount spent in the past year by a random sample of 120 customers who shop at the store. With all conditions for inference met, the economist conducted the appropriate hypothesis test and obtained a p-value of 0.25. Which of the following statements is the most appropriate conclusion for the investigation?
(A) There is convincing statistical evidence that the mean amount of money spent each year by all customers who shop at the store is $1,500. who shop at the store is greater than $1,500. who shop at the store is less than $1,500. who shop at the store is greater than $1,500.
(B) There is convincing statistical evidence that the mean amount of money spent each year by all customers
(C) There is convincing statistical evidence that the mean amount of money spent each year by all customers
(D) There is not convincing statistical evidence that the mean amount of money spent each year by all customers
(E) The ere is not convincing statistical evidence that the mean amount of money spent each year by any sample of 120 customers who shop at the store is greater than $1,500.
Mathematics
1 answer:
kipiarov [429]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

There is convincing statistical evidence that the mean amount of money spent each year by all customers who shop at the store is $1,500.

Step-by-step explanation:

We must recall that the investigator wishes to investigate whether the mean amount spent was greater than the reported average obtained the mean. From this, we have the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis (H_{0}):               \mu_{0} = $1500

Alternative hypothesis (H_{1}):    \mu_{0} > $1500

We assume the level of significance (\alpha) = 5%.

We are told that all conditions for inference are met, and the economist conducted the appropriate hypothesis test and obtained a p-value of 0.25.

Based on statistical test conclusion, if p-value is higher that the level of significance (\alpha), we conclude that the test is insignificant, otherwise, it is significant.

The p-value is given as 0.25 and this value is higher than level of significance (\alpha) = 0.05. Hence, the test is insignificant. This simply means that, nothing new is discover. Thus, the claim or recent report that customers who shop at a certain online store spend, on average, $1,500 a year at the store is TRUE.

We therefore conclude that, <em>there is convincing statistical evidence that the mean amount of money spent each year by all customers who shop at the store is $1,500.</em>

You might be interested in
if your bag of M&amp;M’s has 8 yellow out of 24 , how many of them will be yellow i’d the bag has a total of 96?
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer: 32

Step-by-step explanation:

96 divided by 24 is 4

8x4=32

7 0
3 years ago
If F is the function defined by F(x)=3x−1 find the solution set for F(x)=−7
Marina CMI [18]

f(x) = -7 \\\\\implies 3x -1 = -7\\\\\implies 3x = -7 +1 \\\\\implies 3x = -6\\\\\implies x = - \dfrac 63  =-2

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me im confused....PLZZZZ
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter (P) of a rectangle is calculated as

P = 2l + 2w ( l is the length and w the width )

perimeter of rectangle A = 2(7) + 2(5) = 14 + 10 = 24 in

perimeter of rectangle B = 2(4x - 3) + 2x = 8x - 6 + 2x = 10x - 6 in

Equating the two gives

10x - 6 = 24 ( add 6 to both sides )

10x = 30 ( divide both sides by 10 )

x = 3

Thus

length of rectangle B = 4x - 3 = 4(3) - 3 = 12 - 3 = 9 in

Width of rectangle B = x = 3 in

5 0
3 years ago
The length of a rectangle is three times its width. If the perimeter is at most 128cm, what is the greatest possible value for t
anastassius [24]

Answer:

16 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the width be x

The length will be 3 x since the length is three times the width

Perimeter=2(l+w) where l is length and w is width

By substituting 128 cm for perimeter, x for w and 3 x for l then

128=2(3x+x)

128=8x

x=\frac {128}{8}=16

Therefore, the width is 16 cm, the width is 16*3=48 cm

3 0
3 years ago
Jack is working two summer jobs, making $22 per hour tutoring and making $9 per
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The highest point in California is Mount Whitney at 14,494 feet above sea level. The lowest point is the Death Valley at 282 fee
    14·2 answers
  • Just one math question i'll mark brainliest :)
    11·1 answer
  • A store offers a 15% discount on a freezer chest that was originally priced at $630. If the sales tax rate is 7.8%, how much mus
    5·1 answer
  • In two hours Ron read 60 pages of a novel. If the book is 240 pages long, what is the total time that Ron will read at that rate
    10·1 answer
  • Find the area. Simplify your answer. 2x-2 3x​
    14·2 answers
  • What does 8x + 4 equal?
    5·2 answers
  • Dan can spread mulch in 12 hours. If Jessica helps, it takes them
    14·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST a card is picked from the following card find the probability that the card drawn is purple
    9·2 answers
  • What is the greatest common factor of the terms in the polynomial 12x4 + 27x3 + 6x2?
    14·2 answers
  • Find the domain of where f(x) = x + 10 and g(x)=x².
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!