Many areas of the United States experience explosive population growth. The more people that reside someplace, the more demand there is for water there. Often these urban-growth expansions are unplanned and place extraordinary stress on the water supply system, mainly on the groundwater. The stress often depletes groundwater supply, thereby causing wells to dry up. Then water must be brought from somewhere else to support the local population.

Such situations have occurred all over the United States. For example, increased population growth in the southwestern United States has significantly lowered the water table 50 to 200 feet (depending on the area) since the 1940s. Managing urban growth, efforts to reduce water demand, conservation of the resource, and attempts to increase the water supply all address the problem of exceeding water resource limits.

Human activities affect groundwater quality.

Here are some sources and possible solutions to groundwater pollution:

Agriculture—Reduce usage of pesticides and fertilizers.

Landfills—Monitor for leakage and repair linings.

Underground storage tanks—Remove damaged and unused tanks.

Household wastes—Properly dispose of household hazardous waste.

Septic tank leaks—Properly maintain and repair tanks.

Explanation:

This came from the K12 learning course read this and the answer will be there. I underlined the important parts for the answer.

7 0

3 years ago

Is it the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that

kvasek [131]

Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.

Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.

Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that

proves an answer in Science.

Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806

#SPJ9

7 0

1 year ago