For the first one is the variant D because ' <span> the largest U.S. state ' it's a developed apposition which mostly are isolated through commas.
For the second one the correct answer it's variant C because '</span><span>a pack of baseball cards' it's also a developed apposition and because the sentence ends in that way we use a dot instead of comma.</span>
Answer:
Public school students do not lose their constitutional rights when they walk through the schoolhouse doors. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that “students in school as well as out of school are ‘persons’ under our Constitution.” This means that they possess First Amendment rights to express themselves in a variety of ways. They can write articles for the school newspaper, join clubs, distribute literature, and petition school officials.
But public school students do not possess unlimited First Amendment rights. Two legal principles limit their rights. First, as the Supreme Court has said, minors do not possess the same level of constitutional rights as adults. Second, the government generally has greater power to dictate policy when it acts in certain capacities, such as educator, employer or jailer. For instance, a school principal can restrict a student from cursing a teacher in class or in the hallway. However, the principal would have limited, if any, authority to punish a student for criticizing a school official off-campus.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
Answer:
- The court should look to the intention of the founders.
Explanation:
Originalism is associated with the legal doctrine that believes in interpreting or determining the meaning of the words, phrases, or statements mentioned in the Constitution in context of 'the intention of the founders or authors' for ratification of such a clause or law in the Constitution. The originalist philosophy says that the constitution is required to be interpreted on the basis of initial/original understanding or intent of the founders instead of interpreting it in the present context. Therefore, the court should determine the meaning of the constitutional phrase on this philosophy and 'look to the intention of the founders'.
Answer:
She provides examples of things that are invisible
Explanation:
<em>There's more to invisibility than what doesn't meet the eye. </em><em>All sorts of things are invisible to us</em><em>, for different reasons. </em><em>Some, like atoms</em><em>, </em><u><em>are too tiny to see.</em></u><em> Others, l</em><em>ike a black cat on a dark night</em><em>, </em><u><em>aren't lit brightly enough</em></u><em>. </em>
The author provides examples of things that are invisible.
