sunlight..........................
History of the Atom Reading Comprehension is stated below.
The Greek word atoms, which implies unable to cut or divide, is where the name "atom" originates. The atom was believed to be invisible at that time. In contrast to Democritus, Aristotle presented his own theory regarding the nature of matter. Democritus' thesis provided a clearer explanation of the situation, but Aristotle's ideas won out because of his greater stature.
According to his ethics, the only way to acquire eudaimonia—a state of bliss or contentment that is the highest form of human life—is by becoming wonderful. Dalton eventually looked more closely at gases as a result of his fascination with atmospheric pressures. John Dalton is well recognized for his contributions to human optics and for introducing the atomic theory to chemistry.
After discovering the electron, Thomson went on to suggest a model for the atom's structure. In Thomson's "plum pudding" atom model, a positively charged "soup" was surrounded by negatively charged electrons. Thomson made this discovery after his research assistant Francis Aston used a mass spectrometer to fire ionized neon through a magnetic and electric field and noticed two unique deflections. Thomson came to the conclusion that neon existed in two isotopes with distinct masses.
Learn more about atmospheric pressure here-
brainly.com/question/15300008
#SPJ9
Observations are used with observing, forming a hypothesis, and analyzing data.
Answer:
Peer review refers to a process of evaluation which is designed to validate and assess the originality and quality of academic work.
Explanation:
In Academia, the revision of an academic work (<em>e.g</em>. a research article), or peer review, is fundamental to determine its originality and ensure good quality for publishing purposes.
- This process starts when an author submits a research paper to a journal to publish it.
- If all the requirements of the particular journal (each journal has different requirements and specifications) are met, the Editor sends it to experts on the particular area of study to assess it.
- If all experts agree on the quality of the paper, they send a report back to the Editor, who decides whether the article should be<em> rejected, revised</em>, or <em>accepted</em>.
- Authors then check the report and edit it appropriately (if accepted).
- Whether if it is accepted or rejected, the Editor must communicate the decision to the authors of the paper.
Answer:common colds
explanation: