The answer is "the social-conflict approach".
The social conflict approach is a way to deal with social theory that contends that society is described by different disparities and clashes that reason individuals to act socially, delivering change.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, isn't amicable. It's not steady. Society doesn't create agreeable balance. Truth be told, it's overflowing with imbalance. So this methodology is extremely about investigating imbalances of race, class, sexual orientation, and ethnicity, and the social clashes which result. Basically, these contentions will result in change, changes that will move society.
The best way to illustrate the relationship of the comparison is a country using a comparative advantage can create a merchandise at a smaller opportunity cost, even though a different country has an absolute advantage in the manufacture of all those goods.
Answer:
In the postwar era, many Americans moved away from cities and into suburbs, helped by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Administration (VA). And thus we cannot truly say the GI bill is part of why the economy rebounded so quickly. I think that people had easier house loans back In that era.
Explanation:
<span>Factors such as not having the sufficient money to
afford the tuition and not having the necessary connections to get into the
institution. The former is explainable because tertiary education is really
costly and the latter is not knowing who to ask or get in touch when applying
for the institution.</span>
Answer:
Tourism.
Explanation:
the province take advantage of land covered with snow by promoting tourism in this region. People around the world visit beautiful and cold places for their tour so this snowy land is attracted the people towards itself. There is no agriculture is possible in this region due to unfavorable environment so tourism is the only industry which can make the land to earn some valuable money which improves economy of the country.
