This best illustrates the impact of informational social influence.
<h3>What is
informational social influence?</h3>
Informational social influence is a psychological or social phenomenon that refers to a person's propensity to believe that information coming from others is true and correct, particularly in situations when there is uncertainty or obfuscation. We merely adopt the viewpoints of people whose judgment we take to be accurate but which we do not actually possess. When this occurs, we just follow their lead because we think it is the correct thing to do.
We can infer that the impact of informational social influence, rather than peer pressure, is best illustrated when participants in an experiment match the responses of others as described in the scenario provided in the question.
To know more about informational social influence refer to: brainly.com/question/10524203
#SPJ4
It is correct to say that Tiana is a passive follower type, when she is only able to give her opinion and take responsibility in a group discussion when asked.
<h3 /><h3>What is a passive follower?</h3>
It is a style of work performance related to an increase in engagement only when there is a directing the employee by a leader, before generating some kind of reaction.
Therefore, passive followers will only contribute to the work team when requested, which can generate less autonomy and reduced critical thinking.
Find out more about work performance here:
brainly.com/question/4677114
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Every 3 slaves counted as one vote
U.S. foreign policy during the 1920s was characterized by the enactment of isolationist policies: for instance, the US foreign policy towards the League of Nations: US opted not to join even though it had been the nation to first propose such international cooperation. Instead, the United States focused on building the domestic economy by supporting business growth, encouraging industrial expansion, imposing tariffs on imported products and limiting immigration.
(Engagement) President Obama’s primary goal seems to be to bolster respect for ordinary Cubans’ human rights, not to bring about regime change. The opportunity it presented for Cubans to engage with Americans – first family to family, then business to business – was significant.