Answer:
a) VOH Cost variance = Actual cost - (Std cost per hr X Actual hrs worked)
= 10700 - [ (8000/1600) X (6900*0.25)]
10700 - [ 5 x 1725] = 10700-8625 = 2075 (A)
b) VOH Efficiency variance = (Actual hours - Std hours allowed) X Std price
= [(6900 x 0.25) - (0.4 x 6900)] x (8000/1600) = 5175 (A)
c) FOH Cost variance = Actual OH - Budgeted OH = 2840- [3200/4000] x 6900 = 2680 (F)
d) FOH Volume variance = Budgeted OH - Allocated OH = [1600- (0.25 X 6900)] x 3200/1600 = 250 (F)
Things to hep:
1) c is supposed to read: [ c) FOH Cost variance = Actual OH - Budgeted OH = 2840- [ (3200/4000) x 6900 ] = 2680 (F)
2) 2840 - [ (3200/4000) x 6900 ] = 2680 (F)
Answer:
Option C, fall which by itself would decrease aggregate demand, is the right answer.
Explanation:
Option C is correct because the reduction in the confidence level in U.S financial institutions will decrease the U.S net export. Moreover, if the foreigner feels insecure about the U.S bonds then this insecurity will induce them to demand less. Therefore, when the net export decreases the aggregate demand will also fall. Thus we can say option C is right.
to calculate the rule of 70, you take the average growth rate and divide than into 70.
So 70/(growth rate)
Since you did not provide the expected growth rates, you will need to do the calculation yourself.
Answer:
1. Calculate the weighted scores for all brands.
Brand A score = (0.3 * 5) + (0.2 * 2) + (0.2 * 4) + (0.3 * 7)
= 4.8
Brand B score = (0.3 * 3) + (0.2 * 4) + (0.2 * 2) + (0.3 * 7)
= 4.2
Brand C score = (0.3 * 6) + (0.2 * 2) + (0.2 * 7) + (0.3 * 3)
= 4.5
2. Which brand would this consumer likely choose? Brand A
With the highest rating of 4.8, Brand A has the highest score and so will most likely be chosen.
3. Which brand is this consumer least likely to purchase? Brand B
With the lowest rating of 4.2, Brand B will be the least likely to be purchased.
Answer:
Option D high; high
Explanation:
The reason is that the Raymond knows about where Lotus Notes begins and where it ends, so the influence of Raymond is higher which means he has higher bargaining power because the person required as an alternative who will come and review the software from start will cost IBM much more, so the company has limited its bargaining power due to over relaince on Raymond Ozzie. This means this limited bargaining power is due to high cost of shift from Raymond to anyother software designer.