The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The statement best shows her role in the New Kingdom is the following:
"Hatshepsut became the first female pharaoh to rule Egypt."
After the death of Pharaoh Thutmose II, the pharaoh's chief wife, Hatshepsut, served as regent to young Thutmose III. She later took over full control and appointed herself as the pharaoh.
Hatshepsut, Tuthmosis III, Amenhotep III, and Tutankhamun ruled Egypt during the New Kingdom.
These ancient Egyptian Pharaohs ruled in what historians call the 18th Dynasty of Egypt. This dynasty started in 1549 BC and ended in 1292 BC, and is considered to be a period of great accomplishments for the Egyptians and exerted so much power in the Nile River region. Its importance was so big at the time that some historians have named this period the Thutmosid era. During this dynasty, Egypt was ruled by two women Pharaohs: Nefemeferuaten and Hatshepsut. Both Pharaohs had a great deal of success in a time where only men used to govern the lands.
When we find that a person has high status in certain valued dimensions and low status in others, this is <u>Status Incongruence. </u>
Status incongruence occurs:
- When a person scores high in a several dimensions but low in others
- When a person has a job that does not match their characteristics
When status incongruence happens, it can lead to conflict in the workplace as jealousy may arise in coworkers that would be directed towards the person with status incongruence.
In conclusion, the situation described is status incongruence.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/1191818. </em>
Answer:
Explanation: The rule of law are the set of laws guiding every citizen of a country and this laws make every one equal before the law.
Which means that everyone will be punished equally for any office committed contrary to the law.
There several limititations to the rule of law and they are:
1. Deligated Legislation which makes rule of law difficult to control
2. Administrative Adjudication whereby powers are given to administrative officers.
3. Lack of equality before the law
4. Increase in discretionary power
5. Judicial decisions are not made by the courts alone
6. Nature of the administrative law.