1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elden [556K]
3 years ago
13

1. What do you consider to be the strongest and weakest points of La Follette’s argument against President Wilson’s war message?

2. Why did La Follette and the president refer to the German people in positive terms? Might they have done so for somewhat different reasons?
Social Studies
1 answer:
almond37 [142]3 years ago
3 0

Through his speech, La Follette argued and put forward the message that United States's treatment has not been fair and equal.

<u>Explanation:</u>

On April 4, 1917, two days after President Woodrow Wilson's call for war, La Follette contended in the speech Congress that the United States had not been fair in its treatment of British and German infringement of American impartiality.

A Republican congressperson from a state with an enormous farming and German-American populace, La Follette stressed that the war would occupy consideration from household change endeavors. Be that as it may, even in Wisconsin La Follette met resistance; the state lawmaking body reprimanded him, as did a portion of his long-term dynamic partners. One of them said that he was "of more assistance to the Kaiser than a fourth of a million soldiers." - History Matters.

You might be interested in
What country had a one child per family policy in the 1970s
astraxan [27]

The answer is China

7 0
3 years ago
What is 3072 ÷ 32 using long division
zaharov [31]

3072/32 would be 96

32 x 9 is 288

307 - 288 is 19 and drop down the 2 to the end of the number

32 x 6 is 192 so the answer would be 96

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which type of text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies? (6 points)
lana66690 [7]

Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.

Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :

  • The Bandwagon Fallacy:  Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
  • The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
  • The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
  • The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on  insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
  • The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
  • The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.

To learn more  logical fallacies refer

brainly.com/question/18094137

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
All consumers must make decisions that involve trade offs
4vir4ik [10]
All decisions involve trade-offs. Trade offs are the alternatives one gives up whenever one chooses one course of action leaving out out all other alternative courses of action.

Trade-offs are practically found in all economic decisions. For instance, when one chooses to take a special cup of cappuccino for $330, this excludes spending this amount of cash on tea or fruit juice. When you choose to buy an expensive piece of art, you will have to spend more money towards maintenance and security of the painting. If you decide to work in a far-off city due to better pay there, you spend less time with family and friends in your hometown.
8 0
3 years ago
Answer Both Question Please
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

for number 1 .no we have not  there are about 8.7 million species we have yet to discover. for number 2 i can't see to good

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What would happen if it was the same climate everywhere every time
    13·1 answer
  • Popular sovereignty refers to rule by?A) The elite. B) Populists C) Sovereigns D) The people
    6·1 answer
  • Miller (1989) found that in day care centers, _________ varied according to the socioeconomic status of the center's clientele (
    7·2 answers
  • Which country first produced Nike?
    6·2 answers
  • Vladamir comes from a culture in which his own accomplishments are very important to him because he feels that they set him apar
    6·1 answer
  • Literal meaning of a message is referred to as
    13·1 answer
  • In japan, a philosophy based on cooperation and group effort ensures virtually every student qualifies for admission to college.
    15·1 answer
  • Of the OPEC member countries, which one has the least oil reserves?
    14·2 answers
  • N the middle ages every musical document had to be __________. printed in italy or the frankish empire written by the nobility a
    9·1 answer
  • a.one of the major problems with cohort studies is loss to follow-up. b.confounders are not a problem with cohort studies since
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!