Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
They were called nomads because they were always on the move and never had a home land.
I hope this helps
Jimmy Carter was the first president to walk in his inaugural parade since Thomas Jefferson.
Landforms will be the answer! Landforms are made by the earth and are not created or made by humans and are instead made by natural means!
Please give brainliest❤️
The dead animal carcass's and the human ashes and body/bones cause the river to be polluted. CAUSES BAD POLLUTION
