All of the given practices can be effective in minimizing group harms.
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
As mentioned in the options, a collaborative review of the ongoing research by the Institutional Review Board can be taken from time to time during the course of the research to check whether the group of human samples is facing any adverse effects of the research or not.
A chalked plan promising the disclosure of the results of the research can also help in decreasing group harm. Moreover, consultation among the parties participated in research can also reduce the risk of group harm.
Answer:
Water because it's a neccessity
Explanation:
All neccessaties have inelastic demand because humans can't live without them.
The other goods are luxuries and they have elastic demand. they are wants
The tragedy of the commons occurs where property rights are lacking.
In economics, the tragedy of the commons is the situation in which individual users, who have free access to resources, are not bound by shared social structures or rules. officially govern access and use, acting independently in their own interest and contrary to general principles. common interests of all users, causing resource depletion due to their uncoordinated actions.
The concept originated in an essay written in 1833 by the British economist William Forster Lloyd, who used a hypothetical example of the impact of unregulated grazing on the region. common land in Great Britain and Ireland.
To know more about tragedy of the commons here-
brainly.com/question/29221557
#SPJ4
They have been found on oracle bones
Answer:
A. approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial
Explanation:
Solomon Asch's conducted an experiment to determine how social pressure from a majoritywould affect a person to conform. In psychology, conformity is the likelihood of a person to follow the behavior of the social group an individual belongs to. In each experiment, a naive student was placed in a room with several other confederates who agreed in advance what their responses would be when presented with the line task without the real participant knowing. After line task was presented, the confederates began answering the questions correctly. However eventually began providing incorrect answers based on how they had been instructed by the experimenters. They were 18 trials and the confederates provided 12 wrong answers. The purpose of this experiment was to see if the participant would conform to that of the others in the group.
The result at the end of the experiment showed that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
