Answer:
The correct option is B,only if it is in writing.
Explanation:
Such promise is not enforceable since one of key elements of enforceable agreement(contract) is missing.
The missing element is that Abner is not getting anything of value in return for the promise to pay for Claudia's trumpet.
The only way to get Abner to fulfill the promise in law parlance is get the promise documented as well as signed by Abner,that can be used as an evidence against Abner in future in order to ensure the promise is fulfilled.
Answer: decreased , lesser .
Explanation:
Tariffs are used to restrict imports by increasing the price of goods and services purchased from another country, making them less attractive to domestic consumers . Governments may impose tariffs to raise revenue or to protect domestic industrie especially from foreign competition.
Well, yes, is that's the question
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Generally, net income will be the same under absorption costing and variable costing. However, producing fewer units than units sold will decrease the net income under absorption costing. As whatever the variable cost is under the absorption method, fixed manufacturing overhead remains the same that decreases the gross profit and net income. Under the variable costing, the fixed overhead will be calculated as per the units produced. Therefore, the net income will decrease proportionately.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: inflationary impacts are not distributed evenly across the population, therefore, inflation causes the economy to redistribute income across households.
Explanation:
To begin with, <em>inflation</em> is the name that receives, in an economic field, the term that refers to the situation where the economy of a country <em>decreases its purchasing power per unit of money</em> causing a<em> loss of real value in the unit of exchange</em>. Moreover,<em> it affects the economy in many negative ways</em>, such as the reductions of the real value of the wages, causing a more difficult situation for the people to buy the primary groceries. Furthemore, it also increases the opportunity cost of holding money, causing to discourage investment and savings.
Therefore, that it is understandable that the correct answer is the option A, due to the fact that <u><em>a high inflation do not cause a redistribution in the income of the economy to the households, actually it causes the whole oppositve impact. </em></u>
