Answer:
The answer is construct validity.
Explanation:
Construct validity is described as the degree in which a study<em> actually</em> measures what it claims to be measuring. A well-designed research will ideally have high construct validy, while a poorly designed one may confound the variables and result in measuring a different aspect.
For example, if a researcher tries to find which of two perfumes is more attractive to customers, <u>but uses different shaped or coloured bottles</u>, it's possible that the test will lack construct validity (the bottles may affect the customers' opinions).
I do not think so. Our taxes are fair and if we do revolt it would seem like we just did so to anger the government.
Answer:
The correct answer is C ''focus on the social advantages to smoking.''
Explanation:
According to cognitive dissonance, to reduce the tension or discomfort that causes us to do something against our beliefs and opinions, we rationalize or justify our actions to ourselves by reconstructing our attitudes. This happens when we have formed and stable attitudes. For example, knowing that smoking is bad for health and smoking a lot, the person is automatically motivated to make an effort to generate new ideas and beliefs to reduce tension until all their ideas and attitudes fit together, constituting a certain internal coherence and can perform the action with a certain mental and motivational balance.
Answer:
option C Holland is your answer ☺️☺️☺️
