Multiply each side of the equation by 4. Then see whether the equation makes sense.
Answer:
<em>The height of the bullding is 717 ft</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Right Triangles</u>
The trigonometric ratios (sine, cosine, tangent, etc.) are defined as relations between the triangle's side lengths.
The tangent ratio for an internal angle A is:
The image below shows the situation where Ms. M wanted to estimate the height of the Republic Plaza building in downtown Denver.
The angle A is given by his phone's app as A= 82° and the distance from her location and the building is 100 ft. The angle formed by the building and the ground is 90°, thus the tangent ratio must be satisfied. The distance h is the opposite leg to angle A and 100 ft is the adjacent leg, thus:
Solving for h:
Computing:
h = 711.5 ft
We must add the height of Ms, M's eyes. The height of the building is
711.5 ft + 5 ft = 716.5 ft
The height of the building is 717 ft
Answer:
The revised drawing be larger or smaller than your original one
Step-by-step explanation:
The revised drawing be larger or smaller than your original one.
Because a drawing at a scale of:
- 1:10 means that the object is 10 times smaller than in real life scale 1:1
- 1: 8 means that the object is 8 times smaller than in real life scale 1:1
So it means the revised drawing be larger or smaller than your original one
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The lateral surface area excludes the area of top and bottom faces.
Given is the right pentagonal prism with side length of 7 in and height of 12 in.
<u>The lateral area is:</u>
- L = Ph = 5*7*12 = 420 in²
Correct choice is A
Answer: Choice C
Amy is correct because a nonlinear association could increase along the whole data set, while being steeper in some parts than others. The scatterplot could be linear or nonlinear.
======================================================
Explanation:
Just because the data points trend upward (as you go from left to right), it does not mean the data is linearly associated.
Consider a parabola that goes uphill, or an exponential curve that does the same. Both are nonlinear. If we have points close to or on these nonlinear curves, then we consider the scatterplot to have nonlinear association.
Also, you could have points randomly scattered about that don't fit either of those two functions, or any elementary math function your teacher has discussed so far, and yet the points could trend upward. If the points are not close to the same straight line, then we don't have linear association.
-----------------
In short, if the points all fall on the same line or close to it, then we have linear association. Otherwise, we have nonlinear association of some kind.
Joseph's claim that an increasing trend is not enough evidence to conclude the scatterplot is linear or not.
