1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fudgin [204]
4 years ago
13

What is the one reason the colonists had difficulty coming together to revolt against Britain?

History
2 answers:
lidiya [134]4 years ago
6 0
<span> loyalists believed the colonies should still live under the rule of britain</span>
Over [174]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation: The reason why the settlers had difficulty joining the revolt against Britain was because of the few possibilities they had of representation in Parliament, as well as the imposition of taxes which they considered illegitimate since they violated their rights. Faced with these impositions, the settlers had to carry out many protests and meetings in secret in order to finally achieve independence from the United States on July 4, 1776.

You might be interested in
Which legal precedent was set by the decision of Marbury v. Madison, (1803)?
STatiana [176]

Answer:

Judicial Review.

Explanation:

The decision of this case is the cornerstone of our judicial system. As a result, it established judicial review.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the cartoonists perspective on alcohol consumption?
MissTica

Answer:

i think they want more alcohol

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Directions: In your response, be sure to address all parts of the question. Use complete sentences; an outline or bulleted list
Paha777 [63]

a. ONE major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that David M. Potter described the Civil War as an inevitable event given the institutionalized sectionalism between the North and the South.  On the other hand, Michael F. Holt held that the Civil War was an anomaly in American compromise-reaching political tradition.

b. ONE specific historical event or development during 1786-1861 that could support Potter's interpretation is the breakdown of the two-party system.  This development pitted far-right democratic republicanism, which promoted white supremacy, whereas center-right republicanism accepted black equality.

Another historical development to support Potter's interpretation is that the South welcomed the Jim Crow laws and sanctioned the separation principle. On the other hand, the North sought to overturn the law and practice of separatism.

c) According to Holt, the Civil War is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise.  During the Great Compromise of 1787, healthy rivalry ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

Thus, David M. Potter held that the ingrained divisions between the North and the South caused the Civil War, while Michael F. Holt held that the breakdown of the two-party system occasioned the Civil War.

Learn more about the different historical interpretations of the Civil War here: brainly.com/question/11705791

7 0
3 years ago
Explain how Mesoamerica was important to the early people of New Mexico.<br><br> Plzzz make it short
DochEvi [55]

Answer: I aint got no clue. Edgenuity Sucks

Explanation:  Just kidding here you go.

Mesoamerica was responsible for introducing corn, beans, squash, chilies, avocado, and tomatoes to North America. Mesoamerica traded unusual items including macaws, beads, turquoise, copper bells, brightly colored feathers, and fancy headdresses. These were found in New Mexico, which is how we know there was trade between the two areas.

This is exactly what it says on Edgenutity.

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Berlin airlift event almost have led to another crisis
Basile [38]

Answer:

The Berlin Blockade was an attempt in 1948 by the Soviet Union to limit the ability of the United States, Great Britain and France to travel to their sectors of Berlin, which lay within Russian-occupied East Germany. 

In June 1948, the simmering tensions between the Soviet Union and its former allies in World War II, exploded into a full-blown crisis in the city of Berlin. Alarmed by the new U.S. policy of giving economic aid to Germany and other struggling European nations, as well as efforts by the Western Allies to introduce a single currency to the zones they occupied in Germany and Berlin, the Soviets blocked all rail, road and canal access to the western zones of Berlin. Suddenly, some 2.5 million civilians had no access to food, medicine, fuel, electricity and other basic goods. 

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these most likely explains why people in the eastern bloc had little contact with the west
    13·2 answers
  • The French and Indian War was a war between ______________________________.
    10·1 answer
  • Based on this cartoon, which conclusion can be drawn about life in the Jim Crow South?
    6·2 answers
  • Explain the statement :"Tremble , therefore , tyrants of the World" ??someone pls answer fast ...
    6·2 answers
  • Where in North America did the Mound Builders make permanent settlements
    8·1 answer
  • What was characteristic of the treatment of african americans and hispanics in texas prior to the civil rights movement?
    11·1 answer
  • Which nation is governed by a king and a "Consultative Assembly" of 150 councilmen appointed by the king? A) Iran B) Iraq C) Isr
    8·2 answers
  • Which did emperor Aurangzeb do as ruler of the Mughal Empire?
    7·1 answer
  • He story of George Washington Bush might have ended with the rebuke he received by the laws of the Oregon Territory, but Bush ha
    10·1 answer
  • When was the Declaration of Independence adopted?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!