What were the effects of establishing Constantinople as the new capital? Choose four correct answers.

History

2 answers:

grandymaker [24]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A, D, E, F

Explanation:

i took the test

maw [93]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The Four Correct Answers are

The new capital was easier to protect.
The city of Rome remained the richest in the empire.
The city of Rome was protected from enemy invasions.
Resources were dedicated to building powerful walls and defenses in the new capital.

Explanation:

Advantages of establishing Constantinople as the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire are such as:

It could better protect the eastern frontier.
It was farther from the Germanic Invasions of the Western Empire.
It had access to the trade routes which led to the growth of the Empire- It straddled the continents of Europe and Asia.
It was easily fortified on a peninsula with a natural harbor.

You might be interested in

The political and economic division between Eastern and Western European countries after WWII was often referred to as

mina [271]

The Iron Curtain !

now i just have to reach the word requirement

6 0

3 years ago

Which event marked the beginning of the French Revolution?

Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

According to the source EStudy,

The Storming of the Bastille was the event that marked the beginning of the French Revolution. In that period, the Bastille was a fortress were used as a state prison, the prison was known as to be a place that political prisoners were kept and a symbol of the oppression of King Louis XVI.

Hope this helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

HELP ME WITH ECON HW!

natulia [17]

I would have to say it would be C?

6 0

3 years ago

Who was the first govner of massachusetts bay

gregori [183]

I believe it was John Winthrop

8 0

4 years ago

How were the

MArishka [77]

Answer:

These colonies were also different. There was more religious freedom in the Middle colonies than in the New England colonies. This was especially true in Pennsylvania. The Middle colonies had some slaves while the New England colonies had very few slaves. This is true because there was more large scale farming in the southern part of the Middle colonies where the soil was more fertile and the climate more suited for farming. Thus, another difference is the kind of farming done. In the New England colonies, subsistence farming was practiced. These farmers grew enough for their family, but didn’t have too much left to sell to other people. In the Middle colonies, farmers grew crops for sale. The main cash crop was wheat.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers