Answer: cultural diversity has its positive impact only if there is democracy, i.e. free movement of goods, ideas, people. If there is this freedom, then Europe is an extremely creative, free and progressive place. Europeans experienced times of nationalism, wars, revolutions so Europe in itself is not a guarantee of creativity, freedom and progressive thinking, but if there is a population able to establish really "European lifestyle" than diversity can have unique consequences.
Explanation: usually there is a tendency to supress differentness, but Europe experiences the worst consequences of such tendency so there is some sort of notion that diversity is creative and productive and that it is worth of taking care of. Impact ? Populations speaking different languages. educated, flexible, able to work with advanced technologies, psychologically open, accostumed to "different" things, able to travel to distant places and learn.
The answer is mutuality among peers. In addition in the young adulthood, the responsibilities in this stage are centered in the order of the drive to found intimacy, connection, and significant peer relationships. The post persuasive and significant peer relationship is marriage, and this is also the relationship that trends toward the most depth and intimacy. As a result the resolution of the psycho-social crisis is attained by establishing intimacy (mutuality) between peers.
The answer is False
It is actually the opposite.
According to the theory, the world is divided into core countries and periphery countries.
Core countries depend on high-skilled work while periphery countries mostly depend on agriculture, raw materials etc.
In this way, the core countries are able to maintain a dominance and a hegemony on the periphery countries.
Countries such as the Untied States and Germany are considered core countries while countries like Pakistan and Russia are considered periphery nations.
