Answer:
The incremental cash flow is $18,500,000
Explanation:
In the attached excel in I laid the cash flows for each of the two projects side by side for relevant years,thereafter I calculated incremental cash by deducting project's A cash flows from B's.
Finally I summed up the total incremental cash flows to give $18.5 million at the end of year 20.
Answer:
A. The interest rate is 4 percent.
B. The amount of money supplied is 200 bilion dollars and the equilibrium quantity demanded is 200 bilion dollars.
Explanation:
A. To answer this questions you use the table below. The first column is the interest rate. The second column is the quantity of money demanded as an asset at each rate. The third column is the quantity of money demanded for transactions, which is independent of the interested rate. The fourth column is the actual (total) quantity of money demanded at each interest rate, which is the sum of columms 1 and 2. The fifth column is the quantity of money supplied at each interest rate. You wil find the equilibrium interest rate by equating the quantity supplied with the quantity demanded, which occurs at the interest rate of 4 percent.
B. It also follows from the answer above that the equilibrium quantity of money supplied is 200 bilion dollars and the equilibrium quantity demanded is 200 bilion dollars. You can decompose the quantity demanded into its separate components, where the amount of money demanded for transactions is 150 billion dollars and the amount of money demanded as an asset is 50 billion dollars.
<h2><u>
Answers:</u></h2>
Requirement 1:
Well I wasn't able to find the question, but I will list here almost all the possible documentation deficiencies that will play important part in planning audit.
The documentation deficiencies are mostly because of control risks and inherent risk and these are addressed below:
The control risk occurs when the internal control fails to bring efficiency in recording of facts and this practice results in material misstatement either due to error or fraud. So if the internal control system of Garcia and Foster is not well enough that it doesn't bring fairness in the transaction recordings then the internal control system would be high.
Inherent risk is the risk of material misstatement that is posed by an error or omission in recording of financial facts that would result in material misstatement and this is not because of failure of internal control system designed. Inherent risk occurs when a high degree of judgment is required for estimations, solving complex transactions like recording of financial instruments, etc.
Kindly have understanding of these so that you be able to identify the deficiencies of Garcia and Foster.
Requirement 2:
The setting of materiality is dependent on two things. These are professional judgement and the experience of the auditor. Following are some methods of calculating materiality level:
- 5% of Income before tax
- 1% of sales revenue
- 0.5% of total assets
- 1% of shareholder's equity
I think this will help you in deciding whether the materiality level set was correct or not.
Requirement 3:
The planning materiality is the materiality level set at the planning phase of audit. The materiality level is determined by analyzing the draft of financial statement presented by the management.
Whereas on the other hand, tolerable misstatement is the misstatement in the line item of financial statement but this misstatement doesn't impact the fair presentation of the financial statement. If the potential risks associated with the company which might include the internal control risk, inherent risk, audit risk, etc, are higher then the tolerable misstatement might be 10% of the materiality level set. This means if the associated risk with the company is high then the tolerable materiality level set would be lower so that the evidence gathered would be sufficient enough to form a right opinion about the truth and fairness of the financial statement. Furthermore, individually though the tolerable misstatement is not a material misstatement but the aggregate misstatement with other tolerable misstatement might surpass the materiality level. Thus setting tolerable level is very useful in the planning phase.
Referring to the art of war.
In this situation, they would treat your kindness like some sort of advantage for them.
In this particular case, it is best to play along and let them think that they could take advantage of you.
At the right moment, you should unleash your inner aggressiveness and fulfill all of your goals/objectives while they're letting their guards down.
Answer:
Total bet amount= -$2
Explanation:
In a card deck of 52 cards we have 13 diamond cards. Cards are drawn without replacement.
Probability of the first card being diamond = 13/52
Probability of the send card being diamond= 12/51
So the probability for both cards being diamond = (13/52)*(12/51)= 0.0588235
Bet amount for 2 diamonds= probability* amount received
Bet amount for 2 diamonds= 0.0588235* $30= $1.765
Probability of no diamond= 1- 0.0588235
Probability of no diamond= 0.94118
Bet amount for no diamonds= 0.94118* (-$4)
Bet amount for no diamonds= -$3.765
Total bet amount= Bet amount for diamonds + bet amount for no diamonds
Total bet amount= $1.765+ (-$3.765)
Total bet amount= -$2