1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Korolek [52]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following is true regarding privacy rights?a. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that the U.S. Constitution does not p

rovide any right to privacyb. The U.S. Supreme Court has found that the U.S. citizens have a right to privacy based upon the U.S. Constitutionc. The U.S. Constitution specifically provides for a right to privacy within the Second Amendmentd. The U.S. Constitution specifically provides for a right to privacy within the Sixth Amendmente. Both that the U.S. Supreme Court has found that U.S. citizens have a right to privacy based upon the U.S. Constitution and that the U.S. Constitution specifically provides for a right to privacy within the Sixth Amendment
Law
1 answer:
grin007 [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The U.S Supreme Court has found that the U.S. citizens have a right to privacy based upon de U.S. constitution.

Explanation:

Several amendments to the U.S. constitution have been added in order to determine a right to personal autonomy such as:

Privacy of beliegs, provacy of the home against housing for soliders, unreasonable searches, online privacy, right of publicity, among others,

You might be interested in
John is renting a single family house from Chris for the summer. During his tenancy, John caused extensive water damage, which a
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

Act of Waste.

Explanation:

The term "Act of waste" is used in property law to specify the damage done by a tenant or anyone aside from the owner of the property. The abuse or misuse of the property of someone else resulting in damage or destruction of that property.

This term is used in the legal sense in property or real estate when someone who is not the owner of the property abuses or damages it. This allows the owner to press charges in the court or a lawsuit against that person. The lawsuit can be either between the tenant or lessee of the property and the current landlord or the owner of the property.  And <u>in the act of causing damage affecting the house's structural integrity, John commits the act of waste or waste act.</u>

7 0
3 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following intelligence agencies employs the most mathematicians?
Hoochie [10]

Answer:

National Security Agency/Central Security Service

Explanation:

NSA is also one of the most important centers of foreign language analysis and research within the U.S. government and is said to be the largest employer of mathematicians in the United States and perhaps the world.

Your Welcome :)

8 0
2 years ago
Who ye voting for <br> Joe Biden<br> Donald Trump<br> you Answer you get 20 points
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Joe Biden

Explanation:

Dont like Donald trump!!!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jack purchases a cola drink at a fast food chain, while drinking he determines the cola is a caustic drain cleaner. Jack may sue
Natali [406]

Answer:

breach of the implied of merchantability

Explanation:

Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • “Police and crime commissioners have no real power, their presence is to just keep the public happy” arguments for and against
    6·1 answer
  • According to the narrator,what kind of person is Antonia
    13·1 answer
  • What rules do you think parents should set for their kids about using cell phones and computers? Explain why.
    14·1 answer
  • The Statute of Frauds: A. turns a contract into a criminal case if fraud is present B. requires that some contracts be in writin
    12·1 answer
  • According to Pew Research Center data cited in the article, about 2 million immigrants live in California without legal authoriz
    9·1 answer
  • 1 - Multiple choice
    11·1 answer
  • I want to know the list of the countries of the world and their leaders
    14·1 answer
  • The reasonable suspicion law derived from The Terry Vs Ohio Supreme Court ruling ?
    11·1 answer
  • I am more of a question answerer, soooooo FREEEEEEE POOOOIIIINTSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What is the rule of law​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!