Answer: gold and silver
Explanation:
Core historical themes. Motivations for colonization: Spain's colonization goals were to extract gold and silver from the Americas, to stimulate the Spanish economy and make Spain a more powerful country. Spain also aimed to convert Native Americans to Christianity.
Makeup as well as dressing up can enhance one's wellbeing, and hence, make them feel more special and confident. Most women like to dress up and put makeup on because it's a social normality. Whereas some like to wear makeup and dress up because they may feel like doing that all the time.
Answer:
Instinct
Explanation:
Instinct is a phenomenon that describes the unlearned behavior. Instinct is described in relation to motivation. Instinct also occurs in response to the person or animal needs that satisfy some innate internal derives.
Instincts are the term that found out in all the species and is consistent among all the species. Several organisms have faith in instinct behavior. In an organism, one of the organism carry instinct behavior then all species do same.
Instinctual find out in a variety of the species. Instinctual behavior serves in different purposes and found out in the different levels of development of the species.
The commission form of government seems to have placed the power of the local government in the hands of the Federal government.
<h3>What is
Commission form of government?</h3>
Commission form of government is also known as City Manager.
Commission form of government is a system designed to fight corruption and unethical activity in the local government level through promotion of an effective management within the transparent and accountable structure.
In conclusion, the commission form of government seems to have placed the power of the local government in the hands of the Federal government.
Read more about commission form government
<em>brainly.com/question/1601472</em>
Answer: 4. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Explanation:
In June 1978, the Supreme Court declared that affirmative action was legal insofar as racial quotas were not used. The case was brought by a white California man, Allan Bakke who said he had suffered reverse racism as he had higher scores than minority group members but was refused admission because of a University rule that reserved 16% of admission slots for minority groups. The Supreme Court ordered the University to admit Bakkie as using quotas was unconstitutional but also held that race can be used as a valid factor in admissions decisions.
This showed that affirmative action was legal but subject to scrutiny.
