Answer:
That argument is an example of a falacy masquerading as a valid inference.
Explanation:
Fallacy means error, deception or falsehood. Usually a fallacy is a misconception that is conveyed as true, misleading others. On the other hand, when an argument conveying a true idea is used to derive a false conclusion from false assumptions, the inference is valid.
Based on this, we can conclude that the argument quoted in the above question is a fallacy disguised as valid inference, because the speaker of the argument provides the information as a true statement, but it is wrong to draw conclusions about how Anthony will react after his accident, based on how other people reacted.
Answer:
Opposite
Explanation:
Answer to the following question is as follows:
The effects of activating the amygdala as well as the prefrontal cortex on aggressiveness are diametrically opposed. Aggressive behaviour is triggered by activation of the amygdala, whereas aggressiveness is controlled by the prefrontal cortex.
Answer: Either prices go down or income goes up. Income increases, enabling consumers to buy more goods and services.
Explanation:
melting glaciers and warming oceans can directly harm animals, destroy the places they live, and wreak havoc on people's livelihoods and communities. As climate change worsens, dangerous weather events are becoming more frequent or severe.
