The king’s actions that prompted nobles to force the king to sign the Magna Carta was his demand of heavy taxes to fund his unsuccessful wars in France.
This action forced the barons to rebel against the king and the Magna carter was signed in order to limit the king's power.
<h3>What Was the Magna Carter?</h3>
Magna Carta Libertatum, which is shortened as the Magna Carta, is a royal charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. This Charter of rights is referred to as the first known documentation of Human Rights.
Prior to the signing of this charter, the king was viewed as the absolute power and could do as he willed.
Some of his actions were detrimental to the Nobles and in order to preserve his throne from imminent take over, his subjects forced him to sign the Magna Carta.
Learn more about the Magna Carter at brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ1
I would know about John Marshall. He was a federalist supreme court chief justice. He gave more power to the government by taking a loose construction of the Constitution. So basically he said, "If it doesnt say we (Fed Gov't) cant do it, then we can)".
<span>Know about these Court cases </span>
<span>Gibbons V. Ogden </span>
<span>McCullough V. Maryland </span>
<span>Fletcher V. Peck </span>
<span>Cohens V. Virginia </span>
<span>Barron V. Baltimore- this one is hard to find, so basically it just said that because the Bill of Rights was a Federal decision, it didnt apply to the states. </span>
<span>The rest are really easy to find out about, and you could type in John Marshall and it would probably give you all of these. </span>
<span>http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/served/marshall.html </span>
<span>http://www.lawnix.com/cases/gibbons-ogden.html- heres gibbons/ogden</span>
Hmm well here’s what I got:
Back then to the Aztecs Incas and much more human sacrifice was normal
Yes, it would never hurt for a country to be more powerful and stronger /more protected
