1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alina1380 [7]
3 years ago
15

What is the true or false statements of creating a Constitution ​

History
1 answer:
Alisiya [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

the constitution was to create some kind of documents to write down rules in the new world .

Explanation:

in 1776 the constitution was created to replace the article of confedertion,they were concidered. weak and the constitution was a way to seperate powers and build stength

You might be interested in
During the swing era:
masya89 [10]
I believe the answer would be D (all of the above).
6 0
3 years ago
The Umayyads unsuccessfully tried to conquer
fiasKO [112]
The Umayyads were unable to conquer the nascent Christian Kingdoms in the North which included but were not limited to: Leon, Castille, the Basque Territories, and the Catalonian Counties. In addition, the Umayyads were not able to prevent the fragmentation of their territory into the Taifa Kingdoms in 1038.
6 0
3 years ago
Who were the first settlers to reach North America? How did they get to North America? What did they do once they reached North
enot [183]

Answer: The first colony was founded at Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607.

Explanation: Many of the people who settled in the New World came to escape religious persecution. The Pilgrims, founders of Plymouth, Massachusetts, arrived in 1620. In both Virginia and Massachusetts, the colonists flourished with some assistance from Native Americans.

8 0
3 years ago
What is a dynasty?
Tomtit [17]

Answer:

4

Explanation:

a dynasty is a line of rulers of a country. 4 seems to fit this description the most accurately

7 0
3 years ago
50 pts Do you think eyewitness accounts are always believable? Why or why not? Write your answer in 50 to 75 words.
Ber [7]

I believe that eyewitness are not a reliable source to solve a crime or problem. Those eyewitness play a major role in the investigation meaning that they have a advantage to change minds. Some studies think that people over the age of 50 years old aren't reliable for testimony. Though, some might think that study accusation is absurd, it may be correct in some ways.  

Hope I could help! :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did Africans and their descendants or resist enslavement
    11·1 answer
  • True or False All bills designed to raise revenue originate in the senate
    12·1 answer
  • Were vocal and instrumental music equally popular? If not, which was most popular?
    12·2 answers
  • What are 10 good and bad adjectives to describe Napoleon?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the United States apply the Truman Doctrine in the creation of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO)?
    6·2 answers
  • In __________, the court ruled that only in exceptionally rare cases could the government stop the printing of a story, overturn
    13·1 answer
  • In what way does Theravada Buddhism differ from the Buddha’s early teachings?
    6·2 answers
  • After World War II, both the United States and Soviet Union recruited the
    5·1 answer
  • Classical Civilization in China
    11·1 answer
  • What is a midwife?????
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!