Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
The reserve requirement when the federal reserve banks sell $40 million in government securities to commercial banks is $8 million.
<h3>How to calculate the reserve requirement?</h3>
From the information given, the the federal reserve banks sell $40 million in government securities to commercial banks and the reserve ratio is 20 percent.
Therefore, the reserve requirement will be:
= 20% × $40 million
= $8 million.
Learn more about reserve requirements on:
brainly.com/question/25812353
#SPJ1
Answer:
$3.62
Explanation:
The dividend distributed to common share = total net income - dividend for preferred stock
= $1,004,700 - $278,600
= $726,100
Earnings per share (EPS) = The dividend distributed to common share / common shares outstanding
= $726,100/ 200700
= $3.62
Answer:
The net income will decrease and also the total assets will also decrease
Explanation:
Here, we want to know the combined effect on net income and total assets of company that made a decision of distributing assets as a property dividend.
As the asset value is down the entry is asset (credit) and loss on asset (debit)
This will effect the net income as it will come down and total assets value also come down
Answer:
0
$180,000
0
$240,000
Explanation:
In 2018 and 2019, Dorothy may deduct none of the net passive losses that remain after offsetting the passive income. In 2018, the $20,000 of passive income is used to absorb $20,000 of the $200,000 passive loss, leaving $180,000 of passive loss suspended. In 2019, the $40,000 of passive income is used against the $100,000 passive loss, leaving a $60,000 passive loss suspended for that year. Thus , a total of $240,000 of passive losses is suspended at the year 2019 into 2020.
