Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>
<u>Lesson : Simplifying:</u></h2><h2>
<u /></h2><h2>
<u /></h2>
Given:

"Simplifying"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<em />
<em>Remove the parenthesis</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>Multiply the numbers</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>Apply the exponent rule</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>Add the numbers</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>Apply the exponent rule once again</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>Add the numbers once again</em>
<em />
<em />
<em />
<em />
I read this story last year for my 7th grade year. The correct answer is A!
Answer: 10 inches
Explanation: You are given one side of the aquarium which is 18 inches. The top and the bottom of the aquarium is 18 inches because that’s what the diagram gives us. So you can multiply 18 x 2=36. Now, to find the missing side length, subtract the perimeter (56 inches) by 36 and you get 20 inches. However, that’s not your final answer because you have to divide 20/2=10 inches. 10 inches is the missing side length for the left and right side lengths.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
The exterior angle in a triangle is equal to the sum of the interior opposite angles in a triangle
Therefore,

Now solve for x

Now let's solve for the exterior angle

Hope this helps you.
Let me know if you have any other questions :-)
The sum clearly diverges. This is indisputable. The point of the claim above, that

is to demonstrate that a sum of infinitely many terms can be manipulated in a variety of ways to end up with a contradictory result. It's an artifact of trying to do computations with an infinite number of terms.
The mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan famously demonstrated the above as follows: Suppose the series converges to some constant, call it

. Then

Now, recall the geometric power series

which holds for any

. It has derivative

Taking

, we end up with

and so

But as mentioned above, neither power series converges unless

. What Ramanujan did was to consider the sum

as a limit of the power series evaluated at

:

then arrived at the conclusion that

.
But again, let's emphasize that this result is patently wrong, and only serves to demonstrate that one can't manipulate a sum of infinitely many terms like one would a sum of a finite number of terms.