Area of the electronic board is 9000 cm2
Step-by-step explanation:
Write ratios to represent the unknown actual length and width of the display to the scale length and width of the display.
The Electronic board always seems like a rectangular shape
Length= scale÷Actual = 5/36 = 5×36 = 180cm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e42f7/e42f7e4f32233f5d30eeeecfb8085dbe81def9f9" alt="Length= scale÷Actual = 5/36 = 5×36 = 180cm"
Width=scale÷Actual = 1/50 = 1×50 = 50cm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ba0c/1ba0ce7b565cae30bd9ec5505bcd7176eac85f25" alt="Width=scale÷Actual = 1/50 = 1×50 = 50cm"
Area of Rectangle = legnth × width
= 180cm × 50cm = 9000 cm2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c603/4c603ffed403e23612725b0ee5db129d066698cc" alt="= 180cm × 50cm = 9000 cm2"
Area of the electronic board is 9000 cm2
First, we have to add the fractions.
1/3 + 1/4 = 7/12
12 - 7 = 5
She earns 5/12 of her paycheck on Wednesday
Answer:
The original price is $650
Step-by-step explanation:
There's an actual algebra method for this, but this is my method because I find it way easier to remember.
Since the most you can discount out of an item is 100% (well, it's considered free then) let's subtract 100 - 34, which is 66.
Now, turn it into a decimal because it makes the numbers easier- 0.66.
Since when you're finding the discount of an original price, you multiply the original price by the discount- instead for finding the original price for a discounted item we divide $429 by 0.66 instead, since when you divide a number by another number that's under 1 the quotient is a larger number.
So, 429 ÷ 0.66 = 650.
Therefore, the original price of the $429 sale price for a 34% discount is $650.
Answer:
Our score = 0.60, Amanda's score = 0.25
Step-by-step explanation:
For Amanda
μ = 15 , σ = 4
z- score for X = 16 is (From z table)
z = (X - μ)/σ = (16 - 15)/4 = 0.25
For us
μ = 310 , σ = 25
z score for X = 325 (From z table)
z = (325-310)/25 = 0.60
Since our z score is better than Amanda's z score, we can say we did better