Under the Articles of Confederation, why didn't the federal government enforce the laws?

2 answers:

6 0

Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government didn't enforce the laws because there was no executive branch of the government. The correct answer is B.

Vikki [24]3 years ago

6 0

The answer is "A. The states were the ones that enforced the national laws."

The Articles of Confederation filled in as the composed report that set up the elements of the national administration of the United States after it announced autonomy from Great Britain. It set up a feeble focal government that for the most part, yet not by any stretch of the imagination, kept the individual states from directing their own remote tact.

One of the most concerning issues was that the national government had no capacity to force charges. To maintain a strategic distance from any view of "imposing taxes without any political benefit," the Articles of Confederation enabled just state governments to exact expenses. To pay for its costs, the national government needed to ask for cash from the states.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS!!!!!!!!!

Rudik [331]

Answer:

Deborah, also spelled Debbora, prophet and heroine in the Old Testament (Judg. 4 and 5), who inspired the Israelites to a mighty victory over their Canaanite oppressors (the people who lived in the Promised Land, later Palestine, that Moses spoke of before its conquest by the Israelites); the “Song of Deborah”Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Plz help me plz plz plz in beg you....

Elenna [48]

You must read the directions, because I will not do your homework for you.

4 0

3 years ago

What act caused the U.S. to enter the war? a. invasion of Germany c. arrest of spies within the US b. embargo by Italy d. bombin

puteri [66]

Answer: d.bombing of Pearl Harbor

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

According to brutus, which form of government (a large national republic or a confederation of small republics) is more likely t

poizon [28]

According to brutus, A confederation of small republics is more likely to preserve and protect personal liberties, because as the people are the sovereign, and their sentiments are communicated by themselves which is why it must be limited so that the people can conveniently assemble and debate.

The large republics could cancel out the voices of the people and states and the authority of the states, because they are bigger in size and could gain more power and could infringe on state sovereignty, which would infringe on the peoples' liberties

Brutus favors a true confederation, which would be: a number of independent states entering , for conducting certain general concerns, in which they have a common interest, leaving the management of their internal and local affairs to go and their separate governments.

to know more about republic click here

brainly.com/question/15340060

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

Which statement is true about psychological well-being in midlife? Group of answer choices High life adversity is strongly assoc

agasfer [191]

Answer:

Answer:

The following statement is correct about the emotional well-being in midlife - The role of marriage in mental health increases with age, becoming a powerful predictor by late midlife. 

Explanation:

The recent study on marital stability have concluded that stability in marriage becomes an important factor that promotes mental health and satisfaction among individuals who approach midlife stage.

Comparing groups of individuals that were married happily and unhappily, researchers found out that happily married people display both better physical health and emotional well-being.

6 0

3 years ago