There are two correct options from all the available ones in the question: alcohol has a highly inelastic demand and the government wants people to drink less.
A highly inelastic demand refers to an economic situation where demand for a product does not increase or decrease event though price rises or falls – even though the demand quantity for alcohol might fall, the total revenue will still be the same.
The second option is also correct since if the government levies a 40% tax on alcohol, they probably want the citizens to stop consuming them so much.
"SNCC" played a major role in the sit-ins and freedom rides, a leading role in the 1963 March on Washington, Mississippi freedom summer, and the Mississippi freedom Democratic Party over the years . Hope I helped !
This analysis asserts that Schlafly denounced the amendment because she believed it would attack the rights of housewives, give the federal government excessive power, and hurt women already equal before the law in the ways that mattered.
Below is the answer:
Yes. It is TRUE.
The Acts 21:25 esv "In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes"
Try to understand the meaning of the phrase "everyone did what was right in his own eyes". It implies people were being sinful and rebellious at that time for there was no king ruling them and chaos was everywhere.
Among the choices given in the question, the best option that fits Tort Law is it provides compensation to those workers who have been injured on the job. The correct option among all the options given in the question is the last or the fourth option. The Tort law has been derived from several legislative enactments and common principles of law.