fixed expenses ........... it makes sense
Answer:
For this situation agent isn't right in any way. The back up plan should acknowledged the essential duty to pay for all the harms that are brought about by the Dmitri. As this isn't an instance of misrepresentation as the safety net provider would consent to pay on the behalf of Dmitri on the off chance that he failed to pay.
Answer:
No option is correct, since you will have 200 shares and each share should be worth around $60.
Explanation:
If the 2-for-1 stock split takes place then you will have 200 shares instead of 100. For every 1 share that you currently own, the corporation will issue another share.
Since the price of the shares was $120 before the stock split, after the stock split the price will be divided by two (the same proportion). So each new share will cost approximately $60.
In order for option 2 to be correct, the stock spit should have been 3-for-1.
Answer: smaller pipe
Explanation: for the first alternative that is constructing with bid size pipe which cost total of $115 million throughout the 50 years and a pumping cost which cost $25000 less than the smaller pipe for the next 16 years of which after those years, it will be equal.
While the smaller pipe cost $65million + $100million = $165million then plus the pumping cost which is equally higher than the big pipe cost . Already there is a difference in cost(minus pumping cost)= $165-115= $50million.
And then $25,000 *16 years= $400000 .
So the total difference in cost for the first 16 years is $50.4 million.
So now with interest rate of 8% you'll see that much capital is used in the smaller pipe , so if both pipe system receive interest rate of 8%, the smaller pipe will have more interest than the bigger.
Answer:
Maintaining a safe environment with proper
Explanation:
lighting, signage, and disability access
