Check the picture below.
since we know the radius of the larger semicircle is 8, thus its diameter is 16, which is the length of one side of the equilateral triangle. We also know the smaller semicircle has a radius of 1/3, and thus a diameter of 2/3, namely the lenght of one side of the small equilateral triangle.
now, if we just can get the area of the larger figure and the area of the smaller one and subtract the smaller from the larger, we'll be in effect making a hole/gap in the larger and what's leftover is the shaded figure.
![\bf \stackrel{\textit{area of a semi-circle}}{A=\cfrac{1}{2}\pi r^2\qquad r=radius}~\hspace{10em}\stackrel{\textit{area of an equilateral triangle}}{A=\cfrac{s^2\sqrt{3}}{4}\qquad s=\stackrel{side's}{length}} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{\textit{\Large Areas}}{\left[ \stackrel{\textit{larger figure}}{\cfrac{1}{2}\pi 8^2~~+~~\cfrac{16^2\sqrt{3}}{4}} \right]\qquad -\qquad \left[ \cfrac{1}{2}\pi \left( \cfrac{1}{3} \right)^2 +\cfrac{\left( \frac{2}{3} \right)^2\sqrt{3}}{4}\right]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Barea%20of%20a%20semi-circle%7D%7D%7BA%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cpi%20r%5E2%5Cqquad%20r%3Dradius%7D~%5Chspace%7B10em%7D%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Barea%20of%20an%20equilateral%20triangle%7D%7D%7BA%3D%5Ccfrac%7Bs%5E2%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B4%7D%5Cqquad%20s%3D%5Cstackrel%7Bside%27s%7D%7Blength%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7B%5CLarge%20Areas%7D%7D%7B%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Blarger%20figure%7D%7D%7B%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cpi%208%5E2~~%2B~~%5Ccfrac%7B16%5E2%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B4%7D%7D%20%5Cright%5D%5Cqquad%20-%5Cqquad%20%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5Cpi%20%5Cleft%28%20%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%20%5Cright%29%5E2%20%2B%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cleft%28%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%20%5Cright%29%5E2%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B4%7D%5Cright%5D%7D)
![\bf \left[ 32\pi +64\sqrt{3} \right]\qquad -\qquad \left[ \cfrac{\pi }{18}+\cfrac{\frac{4}{9}\sqrt{3}}{4} \right] \\\\\\ \left[ 32\pi +64\sqrt{3} \right]\qquad -\qquad \left[ \cfrac{\pi }{18}+\cfrac{\sqrt{3}}{9} \right]~~\approx~~ 211.38 - 0.37~~\approx~~ 211.01](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cleft%5B%2032%5Cpi%20%2B64%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%20%5Cright%5D%5Cqquad%20-%5Cqquad%20%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cpi%20%7D%7B18%7D%2B%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B9%7D%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B4%7D%20%5Cright%5D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cleft%5B%2032%5Cpi%20%2B64%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%20%5Cright%5D%5Cqquad%20-%5Cqquad%20%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cpi%20%7D%7B18%7D%2B%5Ccfrac%7B%5Csqrt%7B3%7D%7D%7B9%7D%20%5Cright%5D~~%5Capprox~~%20211.38%20-%200.37~~%5Capprox~~%20211.01)
I believe the answer to your question is 23
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello,
<em>"Ray says the third-degree polynomial has four intercepts. Kelsey argues the function can have as many as three zeros only."</em>
We know that Kelsey is right, a polynomial of degree 3 has maximum 3 zeroes, so it means that the graph of this polynomial has maximum 3 x-intercepts.
<u>So how Ray can be right too?</u>
we need to think of y-intercept, if we add the y-intercept then Ray can be right too,
as you can see in one example below
there are 3 x-intercepts and 1 y-intercept.
This being said, Ray is not always right. For instance 
has only 1 zero (multiplicity 3) its graph has only 1 intercept in the point (0,0)
hope this helps
Answer:
4.5
miles
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, he runs
3
miles in
28
minutes. Also, see that
42
=
28
⋅
1.5
.
So, his journey would just be running
1.5
times, with each time running
28
minutes.
So, he runs a total of
1.5
⋅
3
=
4.5
miles
