Answer:
See the attachment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The approach is to take advantage of the definition of a perpendicular bisector to show the base lengths and right angles are congruent, then use SAS with the second side being CD (congruent to itself). It's mainly a matter of deciding what the various reasons are called.
It seems the goal is to show that AC = BC as marked.
Option A: 
Option C: 
Option F: 
Solution:
Given expression is
.
Option A: 



Hence
is equivalent expression of
.
Option B: 



Hence
is not equivalent expression of
.
Option C: 


(proved in option A)
Hence
is equivalent expression of
.
Option D: 


Hence
is not equivalent expression of
.
Option E: 75
75 is a whole number.
Hence 75 is not equivalent expression of
.
Option F: 


(proved in option A)
Hence
is equivalent expression of
.
Therefore,
are all equivalent expressions of
.
Answer:
nothing
Step-by-step explanation:
lol
Answer:
2 cherries to 9 ice cream
Step-by-step explanation:
If this is the only information you are given then no. This is because the < sign means that p is less than 2. The second sign cannot be true if the first one is because the second sign says that p is less than or equal to 2.