Answer:
The cost of opportunity is 4 pancakes.
Explanation:
The cost of opportunity is by definition the amount of things you don't do or buy, because of choosing doing or buying something else. In this case, Maria can make:
This means that at every moment, she can choose to make or 8 pancakes or 2 waffles, but not both. If we continue with this logic, in the time she could make 1 waffle, she could have chosen to make 4 pancakes. This is her cost of opportunity.
Answer:
the earning per common share is $3.83 per share
Explanation:
The computation of the earning per common share is shown below
= Net income ÷ weighted number of outstanding shares
= $1,143,000 ÷ (298,000 shares)
= $3.83 per share
We simply divided the net income from the weighted number of outstanding shares so that the earning per share could be determined
hence, the earning per common share is $3.83 per share
Answer: That you are qualified for the job role
Explanation:
Certifications allows an employees to show a current or future hiring manager that they possess the skill set and expertise needed for the job.
They help the employers hire the most competent and qualified personnel for the job as it shows you know your way around the job. And when that certification is now backed by real world on the job experience, this gives the hiring manager a sense of security.
A- The net earnings of the individual in question will be $710000 after the individual's claim for loss by fire is settled by the insurance company. B- Yes, he would buy the insurance if he were risk neutral.
C- Yes, the individual will buy the insurance policy if he were a expected utility maximizer as he would want to claim complete settlement of this amount to be claimed in case of fire loss.
- The expected net earnings from the insurance after deducting the amount from the premium paid and total claim endorsed by the insurance company will be $710000 which can be shown as below
![\rm Net\ earnings= claim\ received - premium\ of\ policy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20Net%5C%20earnings%3D%20claim%5C%20received%20-%20premium%5C%20of%5C%20policy)
![\rm Net\ earnings= 750000-40000](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20Net%5C%20earnings%3D%20750000-40000)
We get,
![\rm Net\ earnings= 710000](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20Net%5C%20earnings%3D%20710000)
- If the individual were risk neutral he would like to take the insurance as the risk of fire in the example given above is 0.5 which is greater than zero and this ultimately implies that <u>risk cannot be taken.</u>
- In the case if the individual is expected utility maximizer he would take the insurance as it would not only give him the claims from losses due to fire but also help him secure his house against beta of fire.
Hence, the correct answers will be A- $710000; B- Yes.; C- Yes. and imply that taking insurance will be a wise decision by the individual.
To know more about insurance policy , click the link below.
brainly.com/question/24984403
<span>Credit unions of a moderate size should budget 50k towards their digital media. Smaller credit unions should stick to around 10k. The largest credit unions can spend 100k-1m depending on their size.</span>