1463 (1064 divided by 8= 133, 133x11)
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
Answer:
Charles need 
more ounces of seeds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Quantity of seeds Charles has = 
= 
ounces
Quantity of seeds Charles need = 
ounces
Let,
x be the number of remaining seeds Charles need.
x = Seeds needed - Seeds Charles already have
x = 
x = 
x = 
x = 
x = ounces
Hence,
Charles need more ounces of seeds.
Y= 2/2 is the slope of the equation
