The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
0.166 as a percent is 16.6%!
I hope this helped. :)
Please give me brainliest if I am correct!
Answer:
<u>60+14.35=88.27</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
5x12 for the rectangle on the right, then for the circle, using the formula A=πr², I get 28.27, which you divide by 2 because you only need half of the circle, and you get 88.27. I calculated the radius by subtracting 12-6 and then dividing that in half because the radius is half of the distance to the other end of the circle. Then you get the radius of 3, then plug it into the formula to get π(3)², which is just 3.14(9), and you get 28.27.
Answer: True
Step-by-step explanation: This is because they are equivalent fractions
Hope this helps and have a nice day