Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Company 1:
Beginning inventory Merchandise $253,000
Cost of purchases 600,000
Ending inventory Merchandise 153,000
Company 2:
Beginning Finished goods $506,000
Cost of goods manufactured 930,000
Ending Finished goods 147,000
<u>To calculate the cost of goods sold, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods manufactured/purchased - ending finished inventory
<u>Company 1:</u>
COGS= 253,000 + 600,000 - 153,000
COGS= $700,000
<u>Company 2:</u>
COGS= 506,000 + 930,000 - 147,000
COGS= $1,289,000
Answer: I will vote in favor of the bill.
Explanation:
Based on the above scenario, I would vote in favor of the bill. The argument here is in the case of bankruptcy, if an individual is willing to pay their dues but because of unavoidable financial circumstances, the individual seeks more time or other assistance which can help so that the person will later pay. I believe it's a good idea which should be supported by the law.
The court should have the right to decide terms of mortgages to help debtors in order for them to pay their debts in future rather than forcing them to leave the house. It will also help the country deal with issue of facilitating housing to maximum number of individuals.
In my opinion, the judge's decision should be given prime importance as the judge must evaluate the intention of the debtor and the capability of the debtor to pay the debts
<span>The Structural Approach to kinesics studies all movement and sees all behaviors as important and communicative, and studies the KINE or the smallest unit of movement or motion. The External Variable approach however must be interpreted for it to be considered communication, and to be studied. Behaviors must also be full and completed, and it studies the KINEMORPH or the combination of lines, and specific whole movements. And it's also distinguished by idiosyncratic and shared info (personal behaviors/tendencies and behaviors with meaning for the particular group).</span>
Answer:
Option 1 is wrong because in the case of multi-product, breakeven is weighted average which means the sales price will weighted average of sale prices of all the multi-products in the sales mix. If we change the weightings the weighted average costs and selling prices changes and so the contribution changes.
Option 2 is also sligthly wrong because Contribution margin per composite unit decreases if the volume of low contribution margin products increases in the sales mix. This means:
Breakeven Point=Fixed Cost/ Contribution per unit.........equartion 1
If the contribution per unit has been decreased the breakeven will rise.
Its impact depends upon the portfolio of products company is managing. It means it increases breakeven with high effects if the products in sales mix 2 to 3.
Option 3 is 100% right because equation 1 is
Breakeven Point=Fixed Cost/ Contribution per unit
Which says
If the contribution per unit has been decreased the breakeven will rise.
Option 4 is absolutely wrong because if we shift to higher volume in low contribution margin products, Contribution margin per composite unit decreases if the volume of low contribution margin products increases
which means Weighted average contribution has been decreased and as a result breakeven point according to equation 1 has been incresed.
