Answer:
D. When ITQs are used, no one has an incentive to cheat and exceed the quota.
Explanation:
As ITQs (individual transferable quotas) were initially created by the government to regulate an above all, social affair, which is related to the share in the total allowable catch of fish (species).
Since some of the fishermen have lower and some have higher marginal costs of "producing" fish, they trade ITQ's between themselves, with those who have high marginal costs selling ITQs to those that have low marginal costs. Also, the marginal private cost now becomes determined by the initial marginal private cost of the fish, plus the <u>price of the ITQ</u>. Then, it becomes known as the marginal social cost.
The equilibrium for the ITQ price is the difference between the <em>marginal social benefit</em> and the marginal cost. With the base marginal private cost becoming the marginal social cost, no one has the incentive to exceed the quota, as that would make the marginal cost go higher than the price, and the marginal profit lower. This notion creates the equality between self-interest and social interest.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: How should the parties proceed, when talking about the buying of a house in which the buyer has already entered a contract with the seller of the property, before having an inspection performed on it, to find out that there are some issues with the property itself, would be, C: The fixes do not become part of the sales agreement.
Explanation:
To begin with, the buyer should have had the inspection done before entering an agreement, and much more signing the contract. Now that the contract is in place, and since the buyer did not have the inspection done beforehand, the terms that would have made the seller responsible for making fixes on the damaged property are not part of the contract. The buyer signed the contract without these adendums and therefore, it is no longer the seller´s responsibility, as part of the original contract, to take care of them. The buyer must abide by the original contract because he did not insist on having any such provisions placed on it that would have made the seller responsible for the fixes.
Answer:
b.$127,500 increase
Explanation:
Using Accounting Equation we can find thetotal increase in total assets:
Assets = Equity + Liabilities
Change in Assets = Change in Equity + Change in Liabilities
Change in Assets = $37,500 + $90,000
Change in Assets = $127,500
Total Change in equity and liabilities will be equal to the change in Assets.
So, the correct answer is b.$127,500 increase.
Answer:
Kindly check attached picture
Explanation:
Kindly check attached picture for detailed statement using the direct method
Answer:
Small time deposits, money market mutual funds, currency, checkable deposits, savings deposits.
Explanation:
