The answer is C.
A is wrong because by the wars end Hitler and Mussolini were both dead. And Tojo was only tried in the Military Tribunals of the Far East, not the Nuremburg Trials.
B is wrong because all Japanese officials were tried at the Military Tribunals of the Far East.
D is wrong because while bombing English cities is a war crime, the news of the holocaust had just spread; and the public wanted blood for the atrocities that occurred so it more focused on the holocaust masterminds than just the Luftwaffe head Goering.
In economics, a circular flow model is a diagram that is used to represent the monetary transactions in an economy.
National income, output, and expenditure are generated by the activities of the two most vital parts of an economy, its households and firms, as they engage in mutually beneficial exchange.
Households
The primary economic function of households is to supply domestic firms with needed factors of production - land, human capital, real capital and enterprise. The factors are supplied by factor owners in return for a reward. Land is supplied by landowners, human capital by labor, real capital by capital owners (capitalists) and enterprise is provided by entrepreneurs.<span> Entrepreneurs combine the other three factors, and bear the risks associated with production.</span>
The 3rd one is correct I’m pretty sure
Because he articulate the purpose and distinguishing characteristics of copyright, fair use, open access, and the public domain.
By understanding the difference between each of these characteristics, then chris could fully use the information that he obtained from various sources and legally use it for his own purpose.
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
