The existence of pre-tax cost of debt and post-tax cost of debt is due
to the acknoledgement of the tax benefit from issuing debt.There is no
tax benefit from paying divdends,so it makes no sense talking about
pre-tax,post-tax cost of equity for a firm.When you think about cash
flow to equity you can only assume that the taxes owed by the company
have already been paid.Now, the taxation over the income of the
shareholder is a whole different issue that does not take place in this
discussion,since it is not taken in consideration either in cost of
equity or cost of debt.
Answer:
the market value of the property is $628,300
Explanation:
The computation of the market value of the property is shown below;
Gross rent $10,000 × 12= $120,000
Now
= $120,000 × .92 (occupancy rate)
= $110,400
After that
= $110,400 - $47,570
= $62,830
And ,finally the market value of the property is
= $62,830 ÷ 0.10
= $628,300
hence, the market value of the property is $628,300
Answer:
Explanation: hey, do your best i think you can do good
Given:
<span>Fact 1: During contract negotiations, BB’s sales representative promised that the system was “A-1” and “perfect.”
</span><span>Fact 2: The written contract, which the parties later signed, disclaimed all warranties, express and implied.
</span><span>Fact 3: After installation the computer produced only random numbers and letters, rather than the desired accounting information
The express warranty is given in Fact 1 where the Sales Rep promised that the system was "A-1" and "perfect". There is a breach in express warranty here IF the written contract also expresses the same promises.
However, the written contract </span>disclaimed all warranties, express and implied. AND BOTH PARTIES SIGNED THIS CONTRACT. It implies that the buyer has read through the contract and has agreed with what is written in the contract. Thus, they can't file a suit against BB for breaching an express warranty since the written and signed contract has already disclaimed all warranties.
Answer:
Gives equal weight to all cash flows arriving before the cutoff
Explanation:
The payback period measures how long it takes for the amount invested in a project to be recovered from a project.
A project with a shorter pay back period is favoured over projects with longer payback periods.
The payback period gives equal weights to all cash flows before arriving at a cut Off. The discounted payback period remedies this by discounting cash flows.
I hope my answer helps you
