The parents are the usual and appropriate surrogate decision makers for a newborn. The child was the product of their love so they should be the one to decide for the child. It could be inferred that they would be deciding for the betterment of the child because it is assumed that the parents love the child. Therefore, parents are the appropriate surrogate decision maker for a newborn except if proven otherwise.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
anyone can answer doesn't matter what it is
Answer:
Accidental reinforcement
Explanation:
Accidental reinforcement occurs when a reinforcer casually concurs with a positive outcome, so the person associate the outcome with the reinforcer. This type of reinforcement is usually the source of superstitious behaviours.
In this case, Roger associated the fact of wearing green underwear to the good grade he got in his test, the green underwear was the reinforcer that casually concurs with the positive outcome which in this case was the good grade, so Roger started associating both and now he wears green underwear on test days.
A gingival epithelial cell is attached to the basal lamina. Hemidesmosome
type of cell junction allows the cell to attach to the basal lamina.
Hemidesmosomes are very small stud-like structures found in keratinocytes of the epidermis of skin that attach to the extracellular matrix. They are similar in form to desmosomes when visualized by electron microscopy, however, desmosomes attach to adjacent cells.
Hemidesmosomes are also comparable to focal adhesions, as they both attach cells to the extracellular matrix. Instead of desmogleins and desmocollins in the extracellular space, hemidesmosomes utilize integrins. Hemidesmosomes are found in epithelial cells connecting the basal epithelial cells to the lamina lucida, which is part of the basal lamina.[2] Hemidesmosomes are also involved in signaling pathways, such as keratinocyte migration or carcinoma cell intrusion.
Learn more about Hemidesmosomes here
brainly.com/question/22712449
#SPJ4
He wrote about a cannibalistic tribe in Brazilian forests who ate their opponents in rituals after wars. He compared them to barbarians of the 16th century Europe. He would support those societies that glorified the ideal of humanity and supported freedoms while he would criticize oppressive regimes that were against the renaissance ideal of humanism.<span />