Answer:
Implicit Personality Theory
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various sociologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of Implicit Personality Theory. This theory refers to the patterns and biases that a person uses to create their impression of another individual and all based on a small amount of information gathered from a brief interaction.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
There are many influences that could potentially lead a member of the House of Representatives to vote against the wishes of the people in their district. Simply the member could think that their constituents are incorrect in their view or don't possess enough information so therefore, they decide not to vote in accordance with the views of their constituents. Another influence could be that of their political party or the elites in their party that wish for the member to vote a certain a way. Another influence could be special interest groups or lobbies that seek to sway the views of Congress Members. These are all factors that together or separately could make a member of Congress vote in opposition of their constituents views.
Answer:
The slaves on board were suffering from some illness.
Explanation:
The narrator is afraid of ravage from the flux that i s the diarrheal infection.On june 27 the sick slave jumped.Since the narrator was afraid on June 22 of the ravage of the flux it gives us the hint that the slaves on board were suffering from some illness whether it is less or more.
Answer: B. It meant there was enough time for evolution to have occurred slowly
Explanation: Contrary to the theory of creationism, according to which everything is created in the beginning as it is created and the characteristics of animals, plants and humans are the same from the beginning, Darwin's theory of evolution speaks of the gradual development of the qualities necessary for survival. Thus, according to the theory of creationism, the Earth is not very old, at least not as much as was necessary to justify Darwin's evolution. The changes described by Darwin take millions of years, so the theory that the Earth is very old is quite in favour.
