Thanks to decisions by the Supreme Court, home ownership in the United States is more inclusive of other races apart from White Americans.
Both before and after the Fair Housing Act formally made it illegal to discriminate based on a person's race and gender, the Supreme Court made some decisions that tried to make home ownership more inclusive such as:
- Shelley v. Kraemer - here the Supreme Court ruled that it was not possible to enforce covenants in the deeds to property that were restrictive based on race.
- Jones v. Mayer Co. - the Supreme Court ruled that any form of racial discrimination in home ownership was illegal
These are just two cases where the Supreme Court's decision affected homeownership but there are more.
We can conclude however, that based on the Supreme Court's decisions, homeownership is more inclusive of other races.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2630375.</em>
Answer:
An increase in the supply of money works both through lowering interest rates, which spurs investment, and through putting more money in the hands of consumers, making them feel wealthier, and thus stimulating spending. Business firms respond to increased sales by ordering more raw materials and increasing production.
Explanation:
Money supply and interest rates have an inverse relationship. A larger money supply lowers market interest rates, making it less expensive for consumers to borrow. Conversely, smaller money supplies tend to raise market interest rates, making it pricier for consumers to take out a loan.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter b. social loafing.
Explanation:
In social psychology, the term social loafing describes a phenomenon that takes place when individuals work in a group instead of on their own. Social loafing is the tendency people show to exert less effort when working with others. This phenomenon explains why sometimes groups are less efficient and less productive than if the individuals were to work on their own and be responsible for their own productivity. That is the case with Michelle. Now that the group is larger, she is making less effort, being "content to sit back and let others do the work".
Theocracy is the opposite of the separation of Church and Government: it means that the rule in the country is connected to religion.
Pharaoh was the ruler of the country - equivalent to a king, but also he was a priest (the highest priest in the country) and often a God. This means that he took all the administrative and political decisions, but also the religious decisions in the country.
This also meant that the rule of the Pharaoh could not be challenged as it has a divide origin.
I'd say that the answer is observational study because they're just analyzing the data and if it were an experiment they'd be taking data and comparing it.
