A holistic approach is a top-down method that starts with a broad view and progresses to a specific or certain reductionist approach for describing a single topic as needed.
<h3>What is the holistic top-down approach?</h3>
They prefer instructional programs that begin by immersing students in authentic texts that become familiar, relevant contexts to enable direct reading instruction.
The Holistic Top-Down approach recognizes that reading is highly complicated and multifaceted.
Check out the link below to learn more about the holistic approach;
brainly.com/question/27281991
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is "Behavioralism."
Explanation:
"Behaviorialism" (in Political Science) is a methodological approach that prospered in the 1950s.
<em>Behavioralists</em> were consistent in directing the political world towards a more scientific direction. In order to explain the political and social behavior of people, <u>the scientists used mathematical or statistical models, such as data or other quantitative descriptions.</u> It disregarded intuition and other non-quantitative means, such as philosophy.
Statistical relationships were considered in evaluating the variables (independent and dependent). For example, a behavioralist may say that people in the city prefer to eat fast food, while people in the rural area prefer to eat home-cooked dishes according to a detailed data that they have gathered (and not according to intuition or ideologies).
The reasons why President Lincoln believed that the U.S soldiers were fighting for during the American Civil War is that he had high hopes of preserving the union as well as helping the union survive. President Lincoln had only one goal in this Civil War and it was to restore the union. Hope this helps.
The correct answer is<em> a local person accused of murder</em>
.
In the case of the city or country court, they would hear the case of a local person who is being accused of murder. It has more relevance than a resident fighting a ticket for parking on a city street. The city or country court do not have jurisdiction in the case of a state senator accusation of illegal gambling. So, the person accused of murder is the most important one for the court.
The answer would be persuasion. Hope this helps.
