start inside the square root, replace X with -7.
-7 + 11 = 4
The number 4 comes out of the square root as 2.
Now there's a minus factor out there. Let's multiply this negative factor by 2 and get -2.
Now let's add -2 and -3.
Our output is -5.
Answer:
13 seconds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0a82/d0a82738b25de6bb09fac09749e1a5b664a0a974" alt="h = -4.9(t - 13)(t + 2)."
Required
Determine a reasonable solution for t
To do this, we equate h to 0.
becomes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b908d/b908dc2ba35440da04935f4c79c32959f02a93a3" alt="0 = -4.9(t - 13)(t + 2)."
Divide through by -4.9
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aea9/5aea97f1988920716020f7b7d8b58a031c09db0b" alt="0 = (t - 13)(t + 2)."
Reorder the expression
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fc22/5fc223e3fe2508a631ce1ad7e8dd117c4fcf0d21" alt="(t - 13)(t + 2) = 0."
Split
or data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5219a/5219a5306e5db719aade9b8b9697dda9dae046a9" alt="t + 2 = 0"
This gives:
or data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed7f9/ed7f94ab7c974dd0c74bf52044356a2c4c69b43a" alt="t = -2"
But time can't be negative, So:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f318/7f31831bf70c48d366466ef2d6bae78314722fb4" alt="t = 13"
Answer:
an = 2.5n -0.2
Step-by-step explanation:
an = 2.5n -0.2
Answer:
5 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The conclusion "T" logically follows from the premises given and the argument is valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us use notations to represent the steps
P: I take a bus
Q: I take the subway
R: I will be late for my appointment
S: I take a taxi
T: I will be broke
The given statement in symbolic form can be written as,
(P V Q) → R
S → (¬R ∧ T)
(¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S
¬R
___________________
∴ T
PROOF:
1. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S Premise
2. S → (¬R ∧ T) Premise
3. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → (¬R ∧ T) (1), (2), Chain Rule
4. ¬(P ∨ Q) → (¬R ∧ T) (3), DeMorgan's law
5. (P ∨ Q) → R Premise
6. ¬R Premise
7. ¬(P ∨ Q) (5), (6), Modus Tollen's rule
8. ¬R ∧ T (4), (7), Modus Ponen's rule
9. T (8), Rule of Conjunction
Therefore the conclusion "T" logically follows from the given premises and the argument is valid.