Answer:
I think A but I could be wrong
It depends On my what aspect you're looking at it from. According to the theories of population growth and resources, Malthus theory states that population growth will cause resources to deplete to a point where resources (earths carrying capacity) are unable to support the population resulting in the Malthusian crisis. When the crisis happens, there will be positive checks in place such as droughts an famines to lower the population until a sustainable number for resource usage. This is supported by many Neo Malthusian theories aka modern interpretations but one main fact is that this was said in the 18 century and back then it was simply an agrarian society.
Hence there was boserup's theory which was based on necessity is the Mother of invention ( I think I got this quote wrong) and that basically when population growth increase there will be more technology and improvements to society to increase resources available for usage. Which is largely supported by the high dependence on agriculture in agriculture and technological advancements over the years such as the green revolution and industrial revolution,
Ultimately I support Malthusian theory as it makes sense that no matter what, population will always be a liability in terms of resource usage.
The correct answer is crisis manager. Crisis manager is being defined as a leader who has the role of managing or taking action of having to organize unexpected events that happened in an organization by which will harm or disturb its balance.
Either A or B. I will do readersherch
Answer:
The desirable characteristics for the members of a contemporary constitutional convention would be:
Diplomatic
Analytic
Ethic
Environmentally oriented
Critic
Empathic
Professional
With a strong CV in public matters
Explanation:
The contemporary members of a constitutional convention would be diplomatic because this characteristic would allow them to debate, negotiate and agree without any conflict.
They should be analytic because they should evaluate all arguments, proposals and defy them with arguments, to see who has the reason.
They should be ethical because they should be unwavering about influences, bribes, and wrongdoings.
They should be empathic because they should have the ability to understand the other's point of view and help someone else.
They should be professional because that would allow them to have high levels of responsibility in their actions.
They should have a strong Cv in public matters because they should know everything about in bureaucracy, in the use of influences, and the opportunity areas of the system to improve it.
